In what he calls this edition of “They Said What About Us In The US?” 041Culture columnist Mvume Ndimba explores the recent developments in US foreign policy and its impact on global affairs, focusing on the shifting dynamics around Ukraine and the cutbacks in US foreign aid.
As peace talks between Russia and Ukraine seem to be inching toward a conclusion, it’s important to remember the role South Africa played in bringing Ukraine to the table. While Russia and the US initially held private peace talks, South Africa stepped in to encourage all parties—including Ukraine—to engage in meaningful discussions. Given our historical ties to Russia, South Africa’s voice was instrumental in getting Ukraine involved in the talks.
However, while South Africa played a key role in facilitating these peace negotiations, the US government has taken a different approach. The current administration’s decision to drastically cut foreign aid—especially to African nations for HIV treatment and gender studies—has raised questions about America’s commitment to its allies. More concerning is the drastic reduction in funding for Ukraine’s defense effort. A country that once relied on the US for military support is now facing talks where it risks being sidelined. The US has been cozying up to Russia, leaving Ukraine nervous about its future.
The dynamics of foreign aid are a crucial part of this shift. Typically, when a smaller nation faces aggression, it receives financial support from a more powerful country. However, the way this aid is managed can often be more complicated than it seems. A small country receives support, but often with strings attached—such as using “preferred suppliers” for weapons and technology. This practice raises questions about the true motivations behind foreign aid. It’s money laundering, in its own twisted way, as the aid money finds its way back to the pockets of lawmakers and companies with vested interests.
Fast forward to Zelensky’s recent meeting with JD and Big T—two US leaders who were less than receptive to Ukraine’s pleas. The talks felt more like a business transaction, with Zelensky being treated as “little bro” rather than an equal partner in peace talks. The emotional weight of the situation seemed to dissipate, and what was left was a cold, transactional meeting. For Ukraine, the reality is clear: If they don’t comply with US interests—such as a controversial minerals deal—they will lose support, further complicating their situation.
In this new era of American politics, diplomacy has taken a backseat, and business has taken the wheel. Foreign aid is no longer about helping allies but about securing financial interests. The push for resources, like Ukraine’s vast mineral wealth, reveals just how much this new version of the US is being run like a business—where the old rules of diplomacy are no longer in play.
Meanwhile, another question looms over South Africa: What was discussed when Afriforum met with the White House without involving the South African government? What does this meeting mean for the future of our nation and its place on the global stage?
As Ndimba closes his thoughts, there’s little optimism to be found. The future feels uncertain, with South Africa caught in the crosshairs of global power dynamics. In times like these, we can only stay vigilant and continue questioning the forces at play.
Stay dangerous, Mzansi. The digital nomads have found us.
Leave a Reply